Saturday, October 13, 2012

Want to hire a cheap lawyer, watch out! (Part 2)



13 October 2012

When contemplating which attorney to hire, price is typically a factor, but some people seem to weigh it too heavily and end up with the cheapest attorney they can find.  Not only do they run the increased risk that their chosen attorney could cut corners (Want to hire a cheap lawyer, watch out! (Part 1)); but the client also runs the increased risk of their attorney making mistakes, by either action or inaction.  The point this post makes is that federal law states that those mistakes are attributable to the client.
 
Yes, that is right; whatever mistake the attorney makes is yours to keep.  One may think they can simply say they did not know what the lawyer was doing and any mistake will not be determined to be their fault.  But the law of the land as established by the United States Supreme Court says differently.  Pioneer Inv. Ser. Co. v. Brunswick Assocs Ltd. P’ship., 570 US 380, 396 (1993).  And lower courts follow this precedent; the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit has followed the “widely accepted rule” that the attorney’s mistakes are attributed to the client.  KPS & Assocs., Inc. v. Designs By FMC, Inc., 318 F. 3d 1, 16 (1st Cir. 2003) (“[I]n this circuit we have consistently ‘turned a deaf ear to the plea that the sins of the attorney should not be visited upon the client’”) quoting Farm Constr. Servs., Inc. v. Fudge, 831 F.2d 18, 21 (1st Cir. 1987).  Simply put, the law is that “clients must be held accountable for the acts and omissions of their attorneys.” Pioneer Inv. Ser. Co. v. Brunswick Assocs Ltd. P’ship., 570 US at 396.

You may have found this blog from a search like “bankruptcy attorneys in Massachusetts” or “litigation attorneys in Massachusetts” or “identity theft attorneys in Massachusetts” or “foreclosure defense attorneys in Massachusetts” or “debt collection abuse attorneys in Massachusetts” or something similar.  You may be “shopping around” attempting to obtain quotes for legal services to address your situation.  If price is a major factor, we hope you consider this post before making it the only factor, and choose wisely.

Wednesday, October 3, 2012

Massachusetts’ new foreclosure law: how much does it change the landscape of foreclosure law in Massachusetts.

3 October 2012


On 3 August 2012 the Governor signed the law and the substantive portions take effect on 1 November 2012.  It has four main, significant changes to Massachusetts foreclosure law, a very brief description of the changes are:

1) If a mortgage is assigned, the chain of mortgage assignments must be recorded with the registry of deeds prior to issuance of the foreclosure notice;

2) For certain loans, banks must determine whether they would fare better in a loan modification that the homeowner can afford verses after a foreclosure, and if it fares better in offering a loan modification, it must offer one;

3) An affidavit must be filed prior to the publication of a foreclosure notice swearing to the compliance with the new section, etc.; and

4) Third party purchasers can rely on the foreclosing parties’ affidavit and are protected from title claims.

The most discussed and publicized in the mainstream is number 2 above.  It is typically described “on the street” as the bank being required to offer a loan modification, or that the bank must offer a loan modification if it will be better off doing so than foreclosing.  With these layman, cursory descriptions the details of the law are swept over, most importantly, that this new requirement applies only to certain loans.  Specifically, it is the definition in the law for “certain mortgage loan” that is not described.  A mortgage loan is deemed a “certain mortgage loan” by the new law if one or more of 7 different “features” as described in the law apply to the loan.  The law also provides that if the bank cannot determine whether the loan has any of the features or not, then the loan is deemed a “certain mortgage loan.”

            As they say “the devil is in the details” and that is here --- whether this new provision of the new law applies to your loan.  If you are interested in learning how the new law applies to your situation, we encourage you to be sure what the new law can do for you, which may mean not simply relying on what you hear on the street.  In the event you desire to discuss this issue or the new law with this office, feel free to give us a call.